April 20, 2024, 07:16:24 AM
Forum Rules: Read This Before Posting


Topic: Nonreducing sugars?  (Read 10230 times)

0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.

Offline divexo

  • Regular Member
  • ***
  • Posts: 10
  • Mole Snacks: +0/-0
Nonreducing sugars?
« on: September 20, 2010, 12:20:23 AM »
Hi, i've been researching for an hour, looking through all my notes and i absolutely have no idea how to identify the nonreducing sugar out of the below (see attachment), which one is the nonreducing sugar & why?

thank you so much

Offline LVJ

  • New Member
  • **
  • Posts: 5
  • Mole Snacks: +1/-0
  • Gender: Male
Re: Nonreducing sugars?
« Reply #1 on: September 20, 2010, 03:13:10 AM »
A reducing sugar has a carbonyl group in the open-chain form, i.e. a non-reducing sugar doesn't. So in order to find out which one it is, try to think what it would look like if the sugars were open-chained. Drawing out reactions mechanisms would probably help.

Offline AWK

  • Retired Staff
  • Sr. Member
  • *
  • Posts: 7979
  • Mole Snacks: +555/-93
  • Gender: Male
Re: Nonreducing sugars?
« Reply #2 on: September 20, 2010, 03:52:54 AM »
Quote
A reducing sugar has a carbonyl group in the open-chain form, i.e. a non-reducing sugar doesn't.
aldehyde carbonyl !
AWK

Offline LVJ

  • New Member
  • **
  • Posts: 5
  • Mole Snacks: +1/-0
  • Gender: Male
Re: Nonreducing sugars?
« Reply #3 on: September 20, 2010, 04:01:14 AM »
Both aldehyde and ketone carbonyls, since ketoses can tautomerize to aldoses. Anyway, if the sugar has a hemiacetal group in the cyclic form, it is reducing. If it contains an acetal, then it's not.

Offline divexo

  • Regular Member
  • ***
  • Posts: 10
  • Mole Snacks: +0/-0
Re: Nonreducing sugars?
« Reply #4 on: September 20, 2010, 04:49:38 AM »
Thank you all.
So i see that the 'I' has an acetal, so does that mean that I is the nonreducing sugar  :D ??

Offline AWK

  • Retired Staff
  • Sr. Member
  • *
  • Posts: 7979
  • Mole Snacks: +555/-93
  • Gender: Male
Re: Nonreducing sugars?
« Reply #5 on: September 20, 2010, 08:07:36 AM »
Both aldehyde and ketone carbonyls, since ketoses can tautomerize to aldoses. Anyway, if the sugar has a hemiacetal group in the cyclic form, it is reducing. If it contains an acetal, then it's not.
But not during test for reducing sugars.
AWK

Offline divexo

  • Regular Member
  • ***
  • Posts: 10
  • Mole Snacks: +0/-0
Re: Nonreducing sugars?
« Reply #6 on: September 20, 2010, 08:54:20 AM »
So... Is the answer the first, 'I'?

Offline Doc Oc

  • Chemist
  • Full Member
  • *
  • Posts: 564
  • Mole Snacks: +48/-12
Re: Nonreducing sugars?
« Reply #7 on: September 20, 2010, 11:44:04 AM »
No.  I isn't an acetal, it's a hemiacetal.

Offline Dan

  • Retired Staff
  • Sr. Member
  • *
  • Posts: 4716
  • Mole Snacks: +469/-72
  • Gender: Male
  • Organic Chemist
    • My research
Re: Nonreducing sugars?
« Reply #8 on: September 20, 2010, 01:03:11 PM »
But not during test for reducing sugars.

LVJ is correct, ketoses will test positive. Fructose, for example, is classified as a reducing sugar.

Divexo: Hemiacetals and hemiketals are in equilibrium with their corresponding open chain aldehyde and ketone forms. It is these open chain forms that react with an oxidising agent, ketoses achieve this via tautomerism to aldoses. Acetals (or ketals) will test negative unless first hydrolysed (acid catalysed) to hemiacetals (or hemiketals).
My research: Google Scholar and Researchgate

Sponsored Links