April 29, 2024, 02:16:39 AM
Forum Rules: Read This Before Posting


Topic: NMR chemical shift  (Read 2955 times)

0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.

Offline xxangelxwingsxx

  • New Member
  • **
  • Posts: 7
  • Mole Snacks: +0/-0
NMR chemical shift
« on: May 05, 2011, 01:38:13 PM »
A tertiary carbocation is more stable than a primary one, but the 13-C NMR shift for a tertiary carbon is more for tertiary than primary suggesting a carbon atom with more carbons attached is less shielded? Why do extra carbons have this deshielding effect, but then also stabilise positive charges?

Offline xxangelxwingsxx

  • New Member
  • **
  • Posts: 7
  • Mole Snacks: +0/-0
Re: NMR chemical shift
« Reply #1 on: May 05, 2011, 01:47:49 PM »
Is it to do with there being less diamagnetic shielding as there are less adjacent H atoms? If so why are C-C bonds less efficient at shielding than C-H bonds or is it just that C is more electronegative than H so can withdraw electon density from it more efficiently?

And if this is the case then why in a simple molecule such as pentane why does the middle carbon have the highest chemical shift even though both C(3) and C(2)/(4) are both secondary C atoms?

Offline xxangelxwingsxx

  • New Member
  • **
  • Posts: 7
  • Mole Snacks: +0/-0
Re: NMR chemical shift
« Reply #2 on: May 10, 2011, 10:14:54 PM »
*Ignore me, I am impatient*

Sponsored Links