April 17, 2024, 09:55:46 PM
Forum Rules: Read This Before Posting


Topic: Dry Column Vacuum Chromatography  (Read 6766 times)

0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.

Offline Honclbrif

  • Chemist
  • Full Member
  • *
  • Posts: 659
  • Mole Snacks: +58/-10
  • Gender: Male
Dry Column Vacuum Chromatography
« on: September 21, 2011, 04:26:53 PM »
Individual results may vary

Offline Dan

  • Retired Staff
  • Sr. Member
  • *
  • Posts: 4716
  • Mole Snacks: +469/-72
  • Gender: Male
  • Organic Chemist
    • My research
Re: Dry Column Vacuum Chromatography
« Reply #1 on: September 21, 2011, 04:55:38 PM »
Looks interesting. It didn't catch on in the last decade though as far as I'm aware. I might give it a go sometime for large scale stuff (which I don't do much of these days) - I think in that case it could really save time and money.

We don't have sufficiently fine silica to hand, but I'm tempted to get some and have a go one day.
My research: Google Scholar and Researchgate

Offline Honclbrif

  • Chemist
  • Full Member
  • *
  • Posts: 659
  • Mole Snacks: +58/-10
  • Gender: Male
Re: Dry Column Vacuum Chromatography
« Reply #2 on: September 22, 2011, 12:55:54 PM »
Tried it, and it looks like it worked out fairly well.

I started with about 5 g of material1 with three spots (Rfs around 0.7, 0.4, and 0.3). Using about 10 g of silica2 and five 100 mL fractions3 and I actually got decent separation. This was also just using a regular filter flask and not their fancy setup.

Least polar component fell right off, got one slightly mixed fraction where delta Rf = 0.1, and one pure fraction. I'm tempted to try this again next time I go crazy and make a (relatively) huge amount of material. Beats buying a new column and cutting dozens and dozens of fractions.

1biggest column I have can handle maybe 1 g
2regular grade, not that fancy stuff
310% step gradient from 90:10 hexane:EtOAc to 50:50
Individual results may vary

Offline Dan

  • Retired Staff
  • Sr. Member
  • *
  • Posts: 4716
  • Mole Snacks: +469/-72
  • Gender: Male
  • Organic Chemist
    • My research
Re: Dry Column Vacuum Chromatography
« Reply #3 on: September 23, 2011, 04:02:59 AM »
What was the volume of a fraction (relative to the volume of silica used)?

What I normally do for a flash column is run a step gradient very similar to that used in the vacuum method described - something like 5-50% EtOAc in hexane, 5% step gradient, volume of solvent for each step of the gradient is equal to the volume of silica in the column. Each column volume is then collected over ~5 fractions.

I'm wondering if there's really any difference between the technique I use and this vacuum chromatography other than the grade of silica (and consequently the amount of silica) used.

Another question... Is the reason they use vacuum because the back pressure generated in a column using that finer silica too dangerous (or the column is too tedious at a safe pressure)?


My research: Google Scholar and Researchgate

Offline Honclbrif

  • Chemist
  • Full Member
  • *
  • Posts: 659
  • Mole Snacks: +58/-10
  • Gender: Male
Re: Dry Column Vacuum Chromatography
« Reply #4 on: September 23, 2011, 08:01:10 AM »
Volume fraction was about 1:1.

As for the final question, I also suspect that they're using vacuum for those reasons.
Individual results may vary

Offline nox

  • Full Member
  • ****
  • Posts: 202
  • Mole Snacks: +11/-3
  • Gender: Male
Re: Dry Column Vacuum Chromatography
« Reply #5 on: September 23, 2011, 11:38:36 AM »
Haven't tried it personally but a former grad student in the lab used this procedure to purify about ~500 g of stuff and it worked fairly well. (He was doing a 40 step total synthesis, and that was step 6 I believe)

Sponsored Links