I couldn't figure it out. Apparently though the answer was to subtract .005 moles from .01 moles. I understand the logic behind it - that the .005 moles of L cancel the .005 moles of D, and .005 moles are left over.
That's what I suggested - assuming C
D and C
L are concentrations of both forms, calculating the difference C
D-C
L is equivalent to subtracting number of moles of L from number of moles of D in a given volume.
Note that my other proposition is equivalent. I told you to calculate rotation of the solution assuming it contain only D (concentration given) and only L (concentration given), then to find overall rotation subtracting obtained values - which yields exactly the same result.
Then convert that to concentration and so on.
Molarity - mol per liter - IS a concentration. You don't have to convert it to anything, especially if the information in the question is given as angle per molarity (0.16° for 0.110M solution or 0.16°/0.110M=1.45°/M - you can use this value to calculate rotation for any given molar concentration; note that 1g/mL which is a concentration unit used when reporting specific rotation is directly proportional to molarity, which makes the exchangeable in all related equations, you just need some proportionality coefficient).
I just thought that I had to convert the mole ratio to a percentage, find the excess, then multiply the excess by the original concentration. Not sure if that is what you were suggesting or not.
It probably can be done through percentages, but I strongly advice against - as they are irrelevant to the problem. You can drive from New York to Washington through Los Angeles, but thera are much better way of getting from one city to another.