April 19, 2024, 08:11:18 PM
Forum Rules: Read This Before Posting


Topic: Basicity of amine groups  (Read 2315 times)

0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.

Offline bmilla35

  • Regular Member
  • ***
  • Posts: 23
  • Mole Snacks: +0/-0
Basicity of amine groups
« on: December 08, 2011, 11:02:53 PM »
Well, I doubt i'm right, but I tried! We've done a similar example but I still don't quite understand it. (Actually, I don't even know if I did the resonance structures right.) I do see how the positive and negative charge stabilize each other, but there's also a second positive charge right next to it...ahh!!


Offline Dan

  • Retired Staff
  • Sr. Member
  • *
  • Posts: 4716
  • Mole Snacks: +469/-72
  • Gender: Male
  • Organic Chemist
    • My research
Re: Basicity of amine groups
« Reply #1 on: December 09, 2011, 03:54:59 AM »
Your resonance structures are fine, and the argument is logical.
My research: Google Scholar and Researchgate

Offline bmilla35

  • Regular Member
  • ***
  • Posts: 23
  • Mole Snacks: +0/-0
Re: Basicity of amine groups
« Reply #2 on: December 09, 2011, 07:52:12 AM »
Your resonance structures are fine, and the argument is logical.

Thank you!

Offline spirochete

  • Chemist
  • Full Member
  • *
  • Posts: 546
  • Mole Snacks: +51/-9
  • Gender: Male
Re: Basicity of amine groups
« Reply #3 on: December 16, 2011, 09:03:06 PM »
Your answer is good, but for completeness I would also note that Methyl is electron donating as well, by hyperconjugation.  It's just that the ortho-amine substitutent is even more electron donating, thus making the indicated molecule a stronger base.

Sponsored Links