March 28, 2024, 06:24:40 PM
Forum Rules: Read This Before Posting


Topic: Does 3-methyl-2-hexen-6-yne sound like a reasonable name for a structure?  (Read 6412 times)

0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.

Sargex

  • Guest
Does  3-methyl-2-hexen-6-yne  sound like a reasonable name for a structure?
The double bond has the lower number then the triple bond on the end.
« Last Edit: October 27, 2005, 01:46:26 AM by Mitch »

Offline mike

  • Retired Staff
  • Sr. Member
  • *
  • Posts: 1245
  • Mole Snacks: +121/-35
  • Gender: Male
Re:Correct Name
« Reply #1 on: October 25, 2005, 12:51:01 AM »
4-methyl-4-hexenyne?
There is no science without fancy, and no art without facts.

Sargex

  • Guest
Re:Correct Name
« Reply #2 on: October 25, 2005, 01:24:31 AM »
Yes the picture you have there is the structure, is what I wrote an acceptable IUPAC name?
In that name you wrote, what part describes the double bond?

Offline mike

  • Retired Staff
  • Sr. Member
  • *
  • Posts: 1245
  • Mole Snacks: +121/-35
  • Gender: Male
Re:Correct Name
« Reply #3 on: October 25, 2005, 01:27:59 AM »
4 for the double bond, I think the triple bond is 1 because it is at the end.
There is no science without fancy, and no art without facts.

Offline mike

  • Retired Staff
  • Sr. Member
  • *
  • Posts: 1245
  • Mole Snacks: +121/-35
  • Gender: Male
Re:Correct Name
« Reply #4 on: October 25, 2005, 01:28:51 AM »
Quote
4-methyl-4-hexenyne

4-methyl-4-hexen-1-yne
There is no science without fancy, and no art without facts.

Offline movies

  • Organic Minion
  • Retired Staff
  • Sr. Member
  • *
  • Posts: 1973
  • Mole Snacks: +222/-21
  • Gender: Male
  • Better living through chemistry!
Re:Correct Name
« Reply #5 on: October 25, 2005, 11:56:38 AM »
In complex names like this, the number usually goes right before the functional group it is describing.  So I think it should be 4-methylhex-4-en-1-yne.

Sponsored Links