April 18, 2024, 01:48:38 PM
Forum Rules: Read This Before Posting


Topic: using DDQ  (Read 15697 times)

0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.

Offline wisconsinium

  • Regular Member
  • ***
  • Posts: 11
  • Mole Snacks: +0/-0
using DDQ
« on: May 31, 2012, 12:58:45 PM »
I have tried using DDQ to aromatize a compound and the work up was a disaster. I'd appreciate any tips about safety and work up with this material from someone who has used it. I used 1.1 equivalents and refluxed with my starting material in dry dioxane. Should I quench the reaction with aqueous sodium bisulfite or is that not necessary? Is there really such a big risk or cyanide formation?
What color is DDQ-H? I can't find any references about it. Anyway, I added water and got a red precipitate. My compound is new but I am expecting it to be colored and also insoluble in some solvents. I filtered and rinsed with aq bicarb, thinking any DDQ-H would rinse out and got a bright yellow filtrate and the red stuff remained. So could the red solid be my product or is it trapped in the red stuff which is the DDQ-H? I tried to take an NMR of the red solid and it was too messy to be helpful.

Offline discodermolide

  • Chemist
  • Sr. Member
  • *
  • Posts: 5038
  • Mole Snacks: +405/-70
  • Gender: Male
    • My research history
Re: using DDQ
« Reply #1 on: May 31, 2012, 01:08:34 PM »
I have tried using DDQ to aromatize a compound and the work up was a disaster. I'd appreciate any tips about safety and work up with this material from someone who has used it. I used 1.1 equivalents and refluxed with my starting material in dry dioxane. Should I quench the reaction with aqueous sodium bisulfite or is that not necessary? Is there really such a big risk or cyanide formation?
What color is DDQ-H? I can't find any references about it. Anyway, I added water and got a red precipitate. My compound is new but I am expecting it to be colored and also insoluble in some solvents. I filtered and rinsed with aq bicarb, thinking any DDQ-H would rinse out and got a bright yellow filtrate and the red stuff remained. So could the red solid be my product or is it trapped in the red stuff which is the DDQ-H? I tried to take an NMR of the red solid and it was too messy to be helpful.

We used DDq many times. It looks like a messy reaction but it's not really. The conditions depend a lot upon your substrate, some use buffered conditions, some not. Usually one uses Mol. sieve to keep it dry. I have attached an experimental procedure that we used. It may be of use.
Development Chemists do it on Scale, Research Chemists just do it!
My Research History

Offline wisconsinium

  • Regular Member
  • ***
  • Posts: 11
  • Mole Snacks: +0/-0
Re: using DDQ
« Reply #2 on: June 01, 2012, 04:31:03 PM »
So is there a typical color after the reaction is over and the DDQ forms the hydroquinone?

Offline OC pro

  • Chemist
  • Full Member
  • *
  • Posts: 396
  • Mole Snacks: +36/-15
  • Gender: Male
Re: using DDQ
« Reply #3 on: June 02, 2012, 01:05:38 PM »
Washing your product solution with 1N NaOH removes most of the DDQ-H.

Offline discodermolide

  • Chemist
  • Sr. Member
  • *
  • Posts: 5038
  • Mole Snacks: +405/-70
  • Gender: Male
    • My research history
Re: using DDQ
« Reply #4 on: June 02, 2012, 02:06:54 PM »
Washing your product solution with 1N NaOH removes most of the DDQ-H.

That is in the procedure I uploaded!
Development Chemists do it on Scale, Research Chemists just do it!
My Research History

Offline OC pro

  • Chemist
  • Full Member
  • *
  • Posts: 396
  • Mole Snacks: +36/-15
  • Gender: Male
Re: using DDQ
« Reply #5 on: June 02, 2012, 02:16:16 PM »
Sorry disco...too lazy to read  :D

Offline discodermolide

  • Chemist
  • Sr. Member
  • *
  • Posts: 5038
  • Mole Snacks: +405/-70
  • Gender: Male
    • My research history
Re: using DDQ
« Reply #6 on: June 02, 2012, 03:00:36 PM »
Sorry disco...too lazy to read  :D

LOL, shame on you, that was (is) one of my procedures and it works.  :o
« Last Edit: June 02, 2012, 03:13:42 PM by discodermolide »
Development Chemists do it on Scale, Research Chemists just do it!
My Research History

Offline OC pro

  • Chemist
  • Full Member
  • *
  • Posts: 396
  • Mole Snacks: +36/-15
  • Gender: Male
Re: using DDQ
« Reply #7 on: June 02, 2012, 04:46:00 PM »
OT on: Yeah but your procedure is no myth to the experienced chemist  ;D
Have done it accordingly on *only* 500g scale. But with better yield (*ducking down*).
OT off.

Offline discodermolide

  • Chemist
  • Sr. Member
  • *
  • Posts: 5038
  • Mole Snacks: +405/-70
  • Gender: Male
    • My research history
Re: using DDQ
« Reply #8 on: June 03, 2012, 01:05:00 AM »
OT on: Yeah but your procedure is no myth to the experienced chemist  ;D
Have done it accordingly on *only* 500g scale. But with better yield (*ducking down*).
OT off.



There is a good chance that my yield may be somewhat more reproducible and anyway it is easy to get better yields than that quoted here when employing simple molecules ;D
Development Chemists do it on Scale, Research Chemists just do it!
My Research History

Sponsored Links