April 30, 2024, 03:56:43 AM
Forum Rules: Read This Before Posting


Topic: Stereochemistry  (Read 5049 times)

0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.

Offline jschulte

  • New Member
  • **
  • Posts: 5
  • Mole Snacks: +0/-0
Stereochemistry
« on: April 25, 2012, 03:17:09 PM »
How is absolute configuration (R or S) assigned to a molecule that has two identical groups attached to the chiral center, e.g., how was the configuration (S) assigned to (S)-olean?


Offline discodermolide

  • Chemist
  • Sr. Member
  • *
  • Posts: 5038
  • Mole Snacks: +405/-70
  • Gender: Male
    • My research history
Re: Stereochemistry
« Reply #1 on: April 25, 2012, 03:25:29 PM »
How is absolute configuration (R or S) assigned to a molecule that has two identical groups attached to the chiral center, e.g., how was the configuration (S) assigned to (S)-olean?




This is a good case for making a model.
Development Chemists do it on Scale, Research Chemists just do it!
My Research History

Offline qw098

  • Full Member
  • ****
  • Posts: 141
  • Mole Snacks: +5/-0
Re: Stereochemistry
« Reply #2 on: April 25, 2012, 05:00:07 PM »

Offline jschulte

  • New Member
  • **
  • Posts: 5
  • Mole Snacks: +0/-0
Re: Stereochemistry
« Reply #3 on: April 25, 2012, 06:01:08 PM »
I've seen the model.  That doesn't answer my question.  How do you assign priority to the groups around the chiral center if two are identical?

Offline qw098

  • Full Member
  • ****
  • Posts: 141
  • Mole Snacks: +5/-0
Re: Stereochemistry
« Reply #4 on: April 25, 2012, 06:02:04 PM »
Now I understand your question. Great question... now that I realize it, I have no answer!

Anyone have an answer?

Offline fledarmus

  • Chemist
  • Sr. Member
  • *
  • Posts: 1675
  • Mole Snacks: +203/-28
Re: Stereochemistry
« Reply #5 on: April 25, 2012, 07:52:42 PM »
Basically you do it by defining a chiral plane that runs through the center of the molecule. Groups on one (arbitrarily chosen) side of the plane have a higher priority than groups on the other.

Try this reference:

http://books.google.com/books?id=S4o0Hhv7K34C&pg=PA11&lpg=PA11&dq=assigning+stereochemistry+to+helical+compounds&source=bl&ots=MBKapPkWIj&sig=2hLau6eaPh9Pm5s-c7U4m9xjIH4&hl=en&sa=X&ei=cY2YT5_7MI-f6QHC14GFBw&ved=0CCAQ6AEwAA#v=onepage&q&f=false

Offline qw098

  • Full Member
  • ****
  • Posts: 141
  • Mole Snacks: +5/-0
Re: Stereochemistry
« Reply #6 on: April 25, 2012, 10:51:16 PM »
Great stuff as always Fledarmus!

Offline Dan

  • Retired Staff
  • Sr. Member
  • *
  • Posts: 4716
  • Mole Snacks: +469/-72
  • Gender: Male
  • Organic Chemist
    • My research
Re: Stereochemistry
« Reply #7 on: April 26, 2012, 03:10:11 AM »
My research: Google Scholar and Researchgate

Offline jschulte

  • New Member
  • **
  • Posts: 5
  • Mole Snacks: +0/-0
Re: Stereochemistry
« Reply #8 on: April 27, 2012, 11:02:24 AM »
Thanks to fledarmus and Dan.  I think I recall seeing the Fisher projection in the Wikipedia reference many years ago when I took organic.  That refreshed my memory.  Thanks again.

Sponsored Links