[kasmiros]

Hello,
I need some interpretation/analysis of the air HEPA filter results for my school project. I don't know exactly what are the standars of those elements(Al,Br etc.) so I can't say if they are below range or above range. Please, if someone can help me I'd be very grateful.
Here is the document: http://www.nogw.com/images/052008_chemtrail_lab_result_lg.jpg
And it comes from this site(it's in polish): http://zatruteniebo.wordpress.com/opryski-chemtrail-1/
And sorry for my english, hope you understand everything.

[Arkcon]

We can try to help, but we need a definite question:  What is it that you don't know, that you want to know.  To help others I've attached the image to this posting.  I've also sent your site through Google translate:  http://translate.google.com/translate?hl=en&ie=UTF8&prev=_t&sl=auto&tl=en&twu=1&u=http://zatruteniebo.wordpress.com/opryski-chemtrail-1/  This doesn't really look like a school project to me, but instead a site dedicated to conspiracy theories and "junk science".  If I'm wrong, I hope kasmiros: you will come up with an actual question that the school will need you to answer, so we can help.

[Borek]

zatruteniebo (poisoned sky) is a conspiracy theory site, not worth your time.

[kasmiros]

actually, it;s not such a school project, but i;m really interested in chemtrails for a long time, i thought about making extra hours for ppl who would like to watch some films and proofs.
But I found this lab results and i kinda wanna know what's on it. Are those aluminiun etc. above normal range of air and some questions like this
but you know, there are people who agree with chemtrails and ppl who laught at it and do nothing.
But sure, if u got any stricktures i can abandon it, im just a person who wanna change smth, make a difference and kinda intelligent too

[Borek]

This analysis result is completely useless. It doesn't say where the filter was used, for how long, what was the volume of air filtered and so on. Such results make a sense only in well defined context, no context here.

The analysis on the page is also completely meaningless - it states things like "Al - 5120% of the norm" - but it doesn't state what kind of a norm. So it is comparing an unknown to another unknown, and then tries to draw conclusion from the result of comparison. Calling it a bad science would be an insult to the bad science.