March 29, 2024, 06:51:03 AM
Forum Rules: Read This Before Posting


Topic: Why aren't beryllium and Flourine negligible cations/anions?  (Read 5358 times)

0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.

Offline wacki

  • Regular Member
  • ***
  • Posts: 9
  • Mole Snacks: +0/-0
All of group II are negligible but beryllium.   Why?


Also, why isn't Flourine negligible like it's brothers Cl, I and Br?

Offline wacki

  • Regular Member
  • ***
  • Posts: 9
  • Mole Snacks: +0/-0
Understanding the negligibles: NO3, CLO4 & CLO3
« Reply #1 on: June 02, 2013, 07:19:20 PM »
I'm just trying to understand why NO3, CLO4 & CLO3 are negligible.  And a really good way to drill these into my head.

NO3 is nitrate cation
NO2 is nitrite anion

I'm not sure why the above switches from + to -


Wikipedia has a great chart on chlorate and perchlorate.   I assume a minimum of 3 oxygens are needed to stabilize the negative charge via resonance.   2 doesn't cut it.  Other than memorization, is there any way to tell why 2 oxygens aren't good enough?

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Chlorite

Offline Schrödinger

  • Chemist
  • Sr. Member
  • *
  • Posts: 1162
  • Mole Snacks: +138/-98
  • Gender: Male
Re: Why aren't beryllium and Flourine negligible cations/anions?
« Reply #2 on: June 03, 2013, 12:18:31 AM »
What do you mean by negligible? In what way are these elements 'negligible'?
"Destiny is not a matter of chance; but a matter of choice. It is not a thing to be waited for; it is a thing to be achieved."
- William Jennings Bryan

Offline gritch

  • Regular Member
  • ***
  • Posts: 60
  • Mole Snacks: +8/-0
  • Gender: Male
  • Graduate Student: Inorganic Chemistry
Re: Why aren't beryllium and Flourine negligible cations/anions?
« Reply #3 on: June 05, 2013, 07:29:54 PM »
By negligible I assume you mean non-coordinating/nonreactive? Typically halogen anions form bonds with various metals and functional groups through mostly ionic means. This means in most polar solvents (especially water) these compounds are highly liable. Fluoride's smaller size allows it to bond with much more covalent character than the other halogens - in particular is bonds especially well with silicon (such as would be present in glassware) - thus fluoride is much less liable and not "negligible".

Group two elements with their typical 2+ charges are even more likely to bond through ion rather than covalent means, beryllium's small size makes it an exception in much the same way as fluoride.

For your nitrate and nitrite question, the -ate and -ite endings in general refer to the oxidation number of the central atom. -ate denotes high oxidation number (if there are several high oxidation states the prefix per- is also used i.e. permaganate) and -ite denotes low oxidation numbers (for several low oxidation states the prefix hypo- is used i.e. hypochlorite). The common positive oxidation states of nitrogen are +7 and +3 therefore we name the compound containing +7 nitrate and the one containing +3 nitrite. In these polyatomic ions oxygen's oxidation number is -2. Really the only difficulty is only in the naming convenients. 

Offline kriggy

  • Chemist
  • Sr. Member
  • *
  • Posts: 1519
  • Mole Snacks: +135/-16
Re: Why aren't beryllium and Flourine negligible cations/anions?
« Reply #4 on: June 06, 2013, 07:04:12 AM »
+7 nitrogen? Didnt you mean +5?

Offline gritch

  • Regular Member
  • ***
  • Posts: 60
  • Mole Snacks: +8/-0
  • Gender: Male
  • Graduate Student: Inorganic Chemistry
Re: Why aren't beryllium and Flourine negligible cations/anions?
« Reply #5 on: June 06, 2013, 09:10:20 AM »
+7 nitrogen? Didnt you mean +5?

Ah yes. My bad I think I was going to use permaganate as an example at first then rewrote it and forgot to change everything. Good catch.

Offline opsomath

  • Chemist
  • Full Member
  • *
  • Posts: 472
  • Mole Snacks: +50/-8
Re: Why aren't beryllium and Flourine negligible cations/anions?
« Reply #6 on: June 06, 2013, 09:37:35 AM »
Quote
NO3 is nitrate cation
NO2 is nitrite anion

No no no...they are both anions (minus-one charge).

You won't be able to see why unless you have knowledge of Lewis structures.

Offline wacki

  • Regular Member
  • ***
  • Posts: 9
  • Mole Snacks: +0/-0
Re: Why aren't beryllium and Flourine negligible cations/anions?
« Reply #7 on: June 08, 2013, 02:21:33 PM »
What do you mean by negligible? In what way are these elements 'negligible'?

Negligible as in they are used to identify strong acids.  HCl is a strong acid because Cl- is negligible.   Na+ is neglible so NaOH is a strong base.

Negligibles don't change the pH of water.   

Offline wacki

  • Regular Member
  • ***
  • Posts: 9
  • Mole Snacks: +0/-0
Re: Why aren't beryllium and Flourine negligible cations/anions?
« Reply #8 on: June 08, 2013, 03:24:26 PM »
Quote
NO3 is nitrate cation
NO2 is nitrite anion

No no no...they are both anions (minus-one charge).

You won't be able to see why unless you have knowledge of Lewis structures.

I understand everything here:

Lewis Structure YouTube
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=jv55tgoyM0g

It's not really the lewis structure it's the formal charge on the individual atoms.   N is supposed to have 5 but only has 4 electrons and gets a formal charge of +1.   The two single bonded oxygens have a formal charge of -1.     So +1 for N and -2 for 2*singleBonded Oxygen sums up to -1.

The double bonded oxygen has neutral formal charge.


I get all of that.  The problem is you can't draw the lewis structure without assuming 24 electrons as a starting point.     

My ultimate goal regarding the polyatomics is this:   Given just  PO4, SO2 and SO3... what is the actual charge?   How do you figure it out?  You only have the periodic table as a guide.
« Last Edit: June 08, 2013, 03:51:37 PM by wacki »

Offline wacki

  • Regular Member
  • ***
  • Posts: 9
  • Mole Snacks: +0/-0
Re: Why aren't beryllium and Flourine negligible cations/anions?
« Reply #9 on: June 08, 2013, 03:25:18 PM »
I really wish the mod hadn't merged these threads.  These are two different questions.
« Last Edit: June 08, 2013, 03:46:44 PM by wacki »

Offline opsomath

  • Chemist
  • Full Member
  • *
  • Posts: 472
  • Mole Snacks: +50/-8
Re: Why aren't beryllium and Flourine negligible cations/anions?
« Reply #10 on: June 10, 2013, 09:56:43 AM »
Leaving PO4 aside for a moment, SO2 and SO3 can both be either negatively charged or neutral compounds in common practice.

You can't figure out the charge from the formula. You have to state the formula and the charge and draw the structure from that.

Sponsored Links