April 26, 2024, 02:39:30 AM
Forum Rules: Read This Before Posting


Topic: Extremely confusing Equilibrium Question  (Read 3710 times)

0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.

Offline webassignbuddy

  • Full Member
  • ****
  • Posts: 125
  • Mole Snacks: +0/-3
Extremely confusing Equilibrium Question
« on: October 18, 2013, 11:39:15 AM »


I don't get it...I only got the second one right.

My reasoning was, if you INCREASE the concentration of NH3, the reactions shifts more to the right, but to maintain equilibrium, the concentration of O2 would decrease. So [NH3] > [O2] is the correct answer for the 2nd one.

But what about the first one and the third one?

Offline sjb

  • Global Moderator
  • Sr. Member
  • ***
  • Posts: 3652
  • Mole Snacks: +222/-42
  • Gender: Male
Re: Extremely confusing Equilibrium Question
« Reply #1 on: October 18, 2013, 12:06:40 PM »

I don't get it...I only got the second one right.

My reasoning was, if you INCREASE the concentration of NH3, the reactions shifts more to the right, but to maintain equilibrium, the concentration of O2 would decrease. So [NH3] > [O2] is the correct answer for the 2nd one.

But what about the first one and the third one?

For point 1. What would the [NH3] be, relative to the [H2O] if Kc was small? What if it were large?

For point 3. What does the balanced equation tell you about the relative amounts of N2O3 and H2O

Offline Borek

  • Mr. pH
  • Administrator
  • Deity Member
  • *
  • Posts: 27663
  • Mole Snacks: +1801/-410
  • Gender: Male
  • I am known to be occasionally wrong.
    • Chembuddy
Re: Extremely confusing Equilibrium Question
« Reply #2 on: October 18, 2013, 12:48:47 PM »
This is only about stoichiometry, not about equilibrium shifts and whatnot.
ChemBuddy chemical calculators - stoichiometry, pH, concentration, buffer preparation, titrations.info

Offline webassignbuddy

  • Full Member
  • ****
  • Posts: 125
  • Mole Snacks: +0/-3
Re: Extremely confusing Equilibrium Question
« Reply #3 on: October 18, 2013, 02:05:10 PM »

I don't get it...I only got the second one right.

My reasoning was, if you INCREASE the concentration of NH3, the reactions shifts more to the right, but to maintain equilibrium, the concentration of O2 would decrease. So [NH3] > [O2] is the correct answer for the 2nd one.

But what about the first one and the third one?

For point 1. What would the [NH3] be, relative to the [H2O] if Kc was small? What if it were large?

For point 3. What does the balanced equation tell you about the relative amounts of N2O3 and H2O

Wait...but what is Kc??

Offline Borek

  • Mr. pH
  • Administrator
  • Deity Member
  • *
  • Posts: 27663
  • Mole Snacks: +1801/-410
  • Gender: Male
  • I am known to be occasionally wrong.
    • Chembuddy
Re: Extremely confusing Equilibrium Question
« Reply #4 on: October 18, 2013, 04:09:59 PM »
Don't worry about Kc (which is an equilibrium constant BTW). It is completely irrelevant to the question. Think about stoichiometry alone.
ChemBuddy chemical calculators - stoichiometry, pH, concentration, buffer preparation, titrations.info

Offline webassignbuddy

  • Full Member
  • ****
  • Posts: 125
  • Mole Snacks: +0/-3
Re: Extremely confusing Equilibrium Question
« Reply #5 on: October 18, 2013, 06:08:09 PM »
Don't worry about Kc (which is an equilibrium constant BTW). It is completely irrelevant to the question. Think about stoichiometry alone.

Would the first one be equal?

2NH3 has 6 H's. The same as 3H2O

Offline webassignbuddy

  • Full Member
  • ****
  • Posts: 125
  • Mole Snacks: +0/-3
Re: Extremely confusing Equilibrium Question
« Reply #6 on: October 18, 2013, 06:10:49 PM »
Don't worry about Kc (which is an equilibrium constant BTW). It is completely irrelevant to the question. Think about stoichiometry alone.

Actually this is the answer.

[NH3] ? [H2O]
[NH3] > [O2]
[N2O3] <  [H2O]

But why??

Offline ramboacid

  • Full Member
  • ****
  • Posts: 129
  • Mole Snacks: +19/-3
  • USNCO High Honors 2012, 2013
Re: Extremely confusing Equilibrium Question
« Reply #7 on: October 18, 2013, 07:41:07 PM »
Think about the coefficients. If the lefthand side is 2NH3 + 3O2, which compound is being used up more than the other? Same with the products side, N2O3 + 3H2O; which compound is being produced more than the other?
"Opportunity is missed by most people because it is dressed in overalls and looks like work." - Thomas Edison

Offline sjb

  • Global Moderator
  • Sr. Member
  • ***
  • Posts: 3652
  • Mole Snacks: +222/-42
  • Gender: Male
Re: Extremely confusing Equilibrium Question
« Reply #8 on: October 19, 2013, 10:22:09 AM »
This is only about stoichiometry, not about equilibrium shifts and whatnot.

Whilst it is for 2 & 3, I'm not sure it isn't for part 1? Can you elaborate, please?

Offline magician4

  • Chemist
  • Full Member
  • *
  • Posts: 567
  • Mole Snacks: +70/-11
Re: Extremely confusing Equilibrium Question
« Reply #9 on: October 19, 2013, 10:29:29 AM »
without the knowledge of K , (1) cant be answered, and hence deserves "?"

regards

Ingo
There is a theory which states that if ever anybody discovers exactly what the Universe is for and why it is here, it will instantly disappear and be replaced by something even more bizarre and inexplicable. There is another theory which states that this has already happened.
(Douglas Adams)

Sponsored Links