April 29, 2024, 07:43:51 AM
Forum Rules: Read This Before Posting


Topic: Why are antiaromatic substances so unstable?  (Read 4498 times)

0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.

Offline Swedish Architect

  • Regular Member
  • ***
  • Posts: 9
  • Mole Snacks: +0/-1
Why are antiaromatic substances so unstable?
« on: January 09, 2014, 03:28:10 PM »
What feature of an anti-aromatic system makes them so unstable? It may be necessary to add more why aromatic systems are stable as well. This is purely interest.

Thanks  :) ;D

Offline AlphaScent

  • Full Member
  • ****
  • Posts: 638
  • Mole Snacks: +24/-7
  • Gender: Male
Re: Why are antiaromatic substances so unstable?
« Reply #1 on: January 09, 2014, 05:06:13 PM »
What do you think?

If you're not part of the solution, then you're part of the precipitate

Offline Swedish Architect

  • Regular Member
  • ***
  • Posts: 9
  • Mole Snacks: +0/-1
Re: Why are antiaromatic substances so unstable?
« Reply #2 on: January 10, 2014, 12:07:35 PM »
OK, so the general rule is that they must be planar, both aromatic and anti-aromatic (although anti-aromatics bend etc. to escape the unfavourable interaction), and conjugated.
In an aromatic substance, such as benzene, the out-of-plane p-orbitals interact, to form 6 MOs. The 6 electrons occupy the lowest energy, thus an overall bonding effect.
I would think this would be similar if they have 4n electrons??
If I look at cyclooctatetraene it has 8 pi electrons. These I think will interact to form 8 MOs, but only 4 filled.
So it has the lowest MO filled- contribute to bonding effect. Next two MO's - bonding, each with one node, between two lobes. And the next two MO's have one electron each. Is this the case in all anti-aromatic systems??
If it has unpaired electrons, that makes it a free radical?? Therefore highly reactive. This explains why anti-aromatic substances are unstable, because the free radicals are reactive, and unstable. Thanks for getting me thinking!! :)

Sponsored Links