April 25, 2024, 05:32:48 AM
Forum Rules: Read This Before Posting


Topic: Molecular Weight vs. Intermolecular Forces  (Read 2561 times)

0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.

Offline xylofunk

  • New Member
  • **
  • Posts: 4
  • Mole Snacks: +1/-0
Molecular Weight vs. Intermolecular Forces
« on: January 18, 2014, 10:11:09 PM »
Hi there!

I'm a little confused by this question on Heat of Vaporization:


Which one of the following would have the highest molar heat of vaporization?

a. CH3NH2
b. CH4
c. C2H6
d. SiH4
e. H2S


Online I see that many people mark the answer as CH3NH2, but H2S has the highest molecular weight out of the five choices.  Is there a point where intermolecular forces overwhelms molecular weight or vice versa when considering heat of vaporization? How do I determine which is more important in general?

Thanks so much!

Offline Corribus

  • Chemist
  • Sr. Member
  • *
  • Posts: 3482
  • Mole Snacks: +530/-23
  • Gender: Male
  • A lover of spectroscopy and chocolate.
Re: Molecular Weight vs. Intermolecular Forces
« Reply #1 on: January 19, 2014, 01:19:37 AM »
Molecular weight is only a surrogate for intermolecular forces.  That is, what matters is intermolecular forces, and there is a rough correlation between molecular weight and strength of intermolecular forces... because heavier molecules tend to have stronger van der Waals and London dispersion interactions. There are plenty of exceptions, however, where smaller molecules can have stronger intermolecular forces (and thus heat of vaporization) than larger once.  Butane, for existence, is a gas a room temperature while water is a liquid, even though butane is ... what, three times as heavy?

Use molecular weight as a guide, not a rule.
What men are poets who can speak of Jupiter if he were like a man, but if he is an immense spinning sphere of methane and ammonia must be silent?  - Richard P. Feynman

Offline xylofunk

  • New Member
  • **
  • Posts: 4
  • Mole Snacks: +1/-0
Re: Molecular Weight vs. Intermolecular Forces
« Reply #2 on: January 20, 2014, 02:10:33 AM »
Thanks for your response!

Sponsored Links