October 05, 2022, 12:01:05 PM
Forum Rules: Read This Before Posting


Topic: What Sort of Problems Could I Be Researching as a Quantum Chemist?  (Read 2423 times)

0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.

Offline logan3

  • Regular Member
  • ***
  • Posts: 10
  • Mole Snacks: +0/-0
This area sounds interesting to me to focus a PhD on. But I was wondering what problems are there in quantum chemistry that need researchers? If I became a quantum chemist, which sort of problems would I be working on, and are they problems with practical implications or mostly theoretical research? Are there any problems that need work that are related to renewable or sustainable energy research?

Thank-you

Offline orgo814

  • Full Member
  • ****
  • Posts: 412
  • Mole Snacks: +11/-6
Re: What Sort of Problems Could I Be Researching as a Quantum Chemist?
« Reply #1 on: July 02, 2014, 12:06:40 AM »
I'm assuming you took quantum chemistry (usually second semester physical chemistry).

Anyways, it is mostly theoretical research. Try googling quantum chemistry research topics. A quantum chemist in my department is studying fluorescence and phosphorescence of a certain molecule (to give you an example).

Good luck!
« Last Edit: July 02, 2014, 12:22:57 AM by butlerw2 »

Offline logan3

  • Regular Member
  • ***
  • Posts: 10
  • Mole Snacks: +0/-0
Re: What Sort of Problems Could I Be Researching as a Quantum Chemist?
« Reply #2 on: July 02, 2014, 03:57:59 PM »
Thank-you. I also got this reply from a post on another forum:

The primary object of research are normally not chemical systems, but (computational) methods for investigating chemical systems, and other meta-methods of this kind. This can encompass, for example, the development of robust and efficient electronic structure methods, methods for solving nuclear motion problems (vibrational structure, scattering, tunneling, etc), and sometimes initial applications of such new methods to actual chemical questions which were previously intractable. Theoretical chemists who concentrate on applying existing methods to interesting chemical questions (instead of primarily developing new methods) are often called "computational chemists".

In chemistry the division between method development (quantum chemistry) and method application (computational chemistry) is much stronger than in any other field of science I am aware of. Most theorists concentrate on exactly one of the two areas (although there are a few notable exceptions). The primary reason for this is that the skills and the knowledge required to perform these two tasks are very different. For example, to be a good computational chemist, in the first place you actually need to be a *chemist*; that means being able and willing to follow trends and developments in your primary fields in experimental chemistry and knowing if and how your calculations can advance it. For example, a good result in computational chemistry could be an ingenious way to elucidate the reaction mechanism of a catalyst, and based on this, design a better catalyst. In computational chemistry, you need to be able to judge the importance and relevance of experimental papers and procedures.

In contrast, these skills are not required in quantum chemistry, which more often than not could also be described as "applied quantum mechanics" and often boils down to a mix of theoretical physics and computer science. Here the primary skills lie in quantum mechanics (e.g., electronic structure theory), algorithm development, and programming. For example, a good result in quantum chemistry could be an ingenious way to compute electron repulsion integrals or reduce the computational scaling of a powerful electron correlation method, such that the methods become computationally cheaper and can be applied to larger chemical systems (and thus be used for better predictions in computational studies by computational chemists).

But quantum chemistry is not something which is done for the sake of itself. Quantum chemical methods are nowadays ubiquitous in real chemistry (e.g., at this moment, about one in five JACS papers contains some sort of quantum chemical calculation), and persons who are able to significantly advance the computational methodology are well regarded in the chemical community---even if many of them are not "real' chemists themselves.

Sponsored Links