April 25, 2024, 02:02:41 PM
Forum Rules: Read This Before Posting


Topic: Geometries in metal-ligand complexes  (Read 2333 times)

0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.

Offline shafaifer

  • Regular Member
  • ***
  • Posts: 95
  • Mole Snacks: +1/-2
  • Gender: Male
Geometries in metal-ligand complexes
« on: February 15, 2015, 09:14:33 AM »
Attachment:

19:25: The solid state of [Y{N(SiMe32}3] possesses trigonal pyramidal metals centres (N-Y-Nangle=115 degrees) - it's likely that the deviation from planarity is caused by crystal packing.

How can you justify deviations from the trigonal planar structure which is regarded to the two other 3-coordinate complexes? Has it to do with the distorting effect of a chelate ring / steric and electronic factors?

Offline Irlanur

  • Chemist
  • Full Member
  • *
  • Posts: 423
  • Mole Snacks: +32/-4
Re: Geometries in metal-ligand complexes
« Reply #1 on: February 15, 2015, 11:40:54 AM »
Quote
Has it to do with the distorting effect of a chelate ring / steric and electronic factors?

yes, but that's very vague.

Offline shafaifer

  • Regular Member
  • ***
  • Posts: 95
  • Mole Snacks: +1/-2
  • Gender: Male
Re: Geometries in metal-ligand complexes
« Reply #2 on: February 15, 2015, 01:47:48 PM »
Nevertheless, than you very much.

Offline kriggy

  • Chemist
  • Sr. Member
  • *
  • Posts: 1520
  • Mole Snacks: +136/-16
Re: Geometries in metal-ligand complexes
« Reply #3 on: February 16, 2015, 10:33:01 AM »
My answer would be that in the 1st compound the two Si substituents are quite large and they repulse each other. In the 2nd compound its because the 1,10-phenantroline is quite rigid - the coordinating nitrogens has fixed positions. The last one is tricky but I suppose that Ytrium has lone electron pair that distorts the gemetry?

Offline shafaifer

  • Regular Member
  • ***
  • Posts: 95
  • Mole Snacks: +1/-2
  • Gender: Male
Re: Geometries in metal-ligand complexes
« Reply #4 on: February 16, 2015, 02:17:13 PM »
Thank you.

Sponsored Links