April 27, 2024, 08:16:10 AM
Forum Rules: Read This Before Posting


Topic: Arrenhius Eqn + first order rate expession HELP  (Read 3178 times)

0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.

Offline wendyfd

  • Very New Member
  • *
  • Posts: 1
  • Mole Snacks: +0/-0
Arrenhius Eqn + first order rate expession HELP
« on: October 07, 2015, 09:01:00 PM »
The decomposition of urea, (NH2)2CO, in 0.10 M HCl follows the equation

(NH2)2CO (aq) + 2H+ (aq) +H20 --> 2NH4+ (aq) + CO2 (g)

At 60 degree C, k= 5.84 x 10^-6 min^-1 and at 70 degree C, k=2.25 x 10^-5 min^-1. If this rxn is run at 80 degree celsius starting with a urea concentration of 0.0080 M, how many mins will it take to drop to 0.00060 M ?

My professor wrote out the answer but i am having a hard time understanding certain parts. I will indicate below which parts:

ln(k2/k1) = (-Ea/R) x (1/T2 - 1/T1)
ln(2.25 * 10 ^ -5 min^-1/5.84 * 10^ -6 min ^-1 ) = (-E (subscript)a/8.3134 J mol^-1 K^-1) x (1/343 K - 1/333 K )
1.35 = Ea (8.76 * 10 ^-5 K^-1/ 8.314 J mol ^-1 K^-1)
Ea = 1.28 x 10^5 J/mol

Next he uses the eqn again to find "k2" for the part of the question asking for 80 degree celsius and got an answer of k2 =8.02 * 10^-5 min^-1

By using the answers he got he used the rate law eqn

ln(A) = -kt + ln(A) subscript 0
 
thus

ln (0.0080 M/ 0.0006 M) = (8.02 * 10^-5 min^-1 ) * t
solving for t = 32298

i dont understand how he arranged the formula around to get that expression ? what happened to the negative that is suppose to be in front the "kt"
If ln(A) = 0.0006 M and ln(A) subscript 0 = 0.008M shouldnt it be ln(A)/ln(A) subscript 0 ?

Offline mjc123

  • Chemist
  • Sr. Member
  • *
  • Posts: 2053
  • Mole Snacks: +296/-12
Re: Arrenhius Eqn + first order rate expession HELP
« Reply #1 on: October 08, 2015, 05:13:51 AM »
ln A = -kt + ln A0
kt = ln A0 - ln A = ln (A0/A)

Sponsored Links