April 25, 2024, 02:13:30 PM
Forum Rules: Read This Before Posting


Topic: Cool chemical web portal  (Read 15449 times)

0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.

Offline webqc.org

  • Regular Member
  • ***
  • Posts: 15
  • Mole Snacks: +2/-3
    • Cool Chemical Portal
Cool chemical web portal
« on: May 01, 2006, 01:06:16 AM »
Hello! 
Please evaluate my chemical web portal http://www.webqc.org and tell what you think about it.
Thank you in advance!

Offline Mitch

  • General Chemist
  • Administrator
  • Sr. Member
  • *
  • Posts: 5298
  • Mole Snacks: +376/-3
  • Gender: Male
  • "I bring you peace." -Mr. Burns
    • Chemistry Blog
Re: Cool chemical web portal
« Reply #1 on: May 01, 2006, 01:32:35 AM »
It can't be that good if it doesn't link to Chemical Forums. ;)

Elements 110 and 111 have names.
Most Common Suggestions I Make on the Forums.
1. Start by writing a balanced chemical equation.
2. Don't confuse thermodynamic stability with chemical reactivity.
3. Forum Supports LaTex

Offline mike

  • Retired Staff
  • Sr. Member
  • *
  • Posts: 1245
  • Mole Snacks: +121/-35
  • Gender: Male
Re: Cool chemical web portal
« Reply #2 on: May 01, 2006, 02:23:10 AM »
It would be good to include data like:

Ionic radius
Electron configuration
Ionization energies
Stable isotopes

It is quite good though :)
There is no science without fancy, and no art without facts.

Offline Alberto_Kravina

  • Assault Chemist
  • Retired Staff
  • Full Member
  • *
  • Posts: 608
  • Mole Snacks: +70/-15
Re: Cool chemical web portal
« Reply #3 on: May 01, 2006, 04:51:43 AM »
Half-life of the most stable or most important radioisotope could be added...
It's pretty good, though. :)
« Last Edit: May 01, 2006, 04:56:07 AM by Alberto_Kravina »

Offline webqc.org

  • Regular Member
  • ***
  • Posts: 15
  • Mole Snacks: +2/-3
    • Cool Chemical Portal
Re: Cool chemical web portal
« Reply #4 on: May 02, 2006, 03:41:13 AM »
Thanks!
I've just added almost everything as requested :)

Offline Mitch

  • General Chemist
  • Administrator
  • Sr. Member
  • *
  • Posts: 5298
  • Mole Snacks: +376/-3
  • Gender: Male
  • "I bring you peace." -Mr. Burns
    • Chemistry Blog
Re: Cool chemical web portal
« Reply #5 on: May 02, 2006, 12:53:50 PM »
I'll approve the link request after you link to us. ;)
Most Common Suggestions I Make on the Forums.
1. Start by writing a balanced chemical equation.
2. Don't confuse thermodynamic stability with chemical reactivity.
3. Forum Supports LaTex

Offline webqc.org

  • Regular Member
  • ***
  • Posts: 15
  • Mole Snacks: +2/-3
    • Cool Chemical Portal
Re: Cool chemical web portal
« Reply #6 on: May 07, 2006, 05:56:43 PM »
I've just linked in section "LINKS". :)

Check out my new section "ONLINE TOOLS"!
It has "Molar mass calculator" and "Equation balancer".

Offline Mitch

  • General Chemist
  • Administrator
  • Sr. Member
  • *
  • Posts: 5298
  • Mole Snacks: +376/-3
  • Gender: Male
  • "I bring you peace." -Mr. Burns
    • Chemistry Blog
Re: Cool chemical web portal
« Reply #7 on: May 07, 2006, 07:54:26 PM »
The masses for Dubnium to Bohrium are 100% wrong.
Most Common Suggestions I Make on the Forums.
1. Start by writing a balanced chemical equation.
2. Don't confuse thermodynamic stability with chemical reactivity.
3. Forum Supports LaTex

Offline Will

  • Organic Dude
  • Chemist
  • Full Member
  • *
  • Posts: 400
  • Mole Snacks: +58/-2
  • Gender: Male
Re: Cool chemical web portal
« Reply #8 on: May 07, 2006, 08:50:58 PM »
The masses for Dubnium to Bohrium are 100% wrong.

The masses for Bohrium and Seaborgium are only a bit wrong.

Offline webqc.org

  • Regular Member
  • ***
  • Posts: 15
  • Mole Snacks: +2/-3
    • Cool Chemical Portal
Re: Cool chemical web portal
« Reply #9 on: May 07, 2006, 09:03:50 PM »
The masses for Dubnium to Bohrium are 100% wrong.
Thanks!
I guess this will depend on what isotop you will take, and how precise was the mesurement.
I have corrected them to the latest data.

Offline Will

  • Organic Dude
  • Chemist
  • Full Member
  • *
  • Posts: 400
  • Mole Snacks: +58/-2
  • Gender: Male
Re: Cool chemical web portal
« Reply #10 on: May 07, 2006, 09:05:18 PM »
That was quick!

Offline Mitch

  • General Chemist
  • Administrator
  • Sr. Member
  • *
  • Posts: 5298
  • Mole Snacks: +376/-3
  • Gender: Male
  • "I bring you peace." -Mr. Burns
    • Chemistry Blog
Re: Cool chemical web portal
« Reply #11 on: May 07, 2006, 09:32:52 PM »
You should only use the isotope with the longest half life for those masses. The longest living isotopes are Db262, Sg266, Bh267, Hs269, Mt268, Ds271, Rg272.

To figure out the corresponding atomic mass, I sugest you use the predicted atomic mass evaluation's from Audi, Wapstra, Thibault (2003). Or better yet, you can just type in the A and Z in this script I made and it'll tell you the correct amu. :P http://www.chemicalforums.com/index.php?page=scripts#Atomic%20Mass%20Units:%20Audi,%20Wapstra,%20Thibault%20(2003)
Most Common Suggestions I Make on the Forums.
1. Start by writing a balanced chemical equation.
2. Don't confuse thermodynamic stability with chemical reactivity.
3. Forum Supports LaTex

Offline Will

  • Organic Dude
  • Chemist
  • Full Member
  • *
  • Posts: 400
  • Mole Snacks: +58/-2
  • Gender: Male
Re: Cool chemical web portal
« Reply #12 on: May 07, 2006, 09:51:17 PM »
The longest living isotopes don't seem to be the atomic mass quoted (on wikipedia anyway):
{Element [Atomic mass]}
Dubnium [262] - Longest living isotope Db-268
Seaborgium [266] -  Longest living isotope Sg-271
Bohrium [264] - Longest living isotope Bh-262
Hassium [269] - Longest living isotope Hs-269 (same) (my periodic table says: Hs [277])
Meitnerium [268] - Longest living isotope Mt-276
Darmstadtium [281] - Longest living isotope Ds-281 (same)
Roentgenium [272] - Longest living isotope Rg-280

As much as I trust wikipedia it could be wrong.

Offline Mitch

  • General Chemist
  • Administrator
  • Sr. Member
  • *
  • Posts: 5298
  • Mole Snacks: +376/-3
  • Gender: Male
  • "I bring you peace." -Mr. Burns
    • Chemistry Blog
Re: Cool chemical web portal
« Reply #13 on: May 07, 2006, 10:02:08 PM »
I never trust wikipedia, the ones above I quoted are most accurate and actually independently confirmed by more than one laboratory.
Most Common Suggestions I Make on the Forums.
1. Start by writing a balanced chemical equation.
2. Don't confuse thermodynamic stability with chemical reactivity.
3. Forum Supports LaTex

Offline Will

  • Organic Dude
  • Chemist
  • Full Member
  • *
  • Posts: 400
  • Mole Snacks: +58/-2
  • Gender: Male
Re: Cool chemical web portal
« Reply #14 on: May 07, 2006, 10:30:42 PM »
This is a silly discussion.

Quote
Dr. Seaborg was given a leave of absence from the University of California from 1942-1946, during which period he headed the plutonium work of the Manhattan Project at the University of Chicago Metallurgical Laboratory.
http://nobelprize.org/chemistry/laureates/1951/seaborg-bio.html

Quote
On April 19, 1942, Seaborg reached Chicago, and joined up with the chemistry group at the Metallurgical Laboratory at the University of Chicago, where Fermi and his group had already learned how to convert U238 to plutonium using a chain-reacting pile. Seaborg's role was to figure out how to extract the tiny bit of plutonium from the mass of uranium.
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Glenn_Seaborg

This is all well documented there is no mystery except from dillusional conspiracy theorists.

I never trust wikipedia

Except when it comes to getting information on Glenn Seaborg!

Sponsored Links