April 28, 2024, 05:57:04 PM
Forum Rules: Read This Before Posting


Topic: band gap: Si and Diamond  (Read 5054 times)

0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.

Offline Mel22

  • Regular Member
  • ***
  • Posts: 18
  • Mole Snacks: +1/-1
  • I'm a mole!
band gap: Si and Diamond
« on: May 21, 2006, 08:44:42 AM »
Can anyone help me finding out why Si has a smaller band gap than Diamond?

Offline Dan

  • Retired Staff
  • Sr. Member
  • *
  • Posts: 4716
  • Mole Snacks: +469/-72
  • Gender: Male
  • Organic Chemist
    • My research
Re: band gap: Si and Diamond
« Reply #1 on: May 21, 2006, 04:34:03 PM »
When it comes to band gaps, I find it useful to think of the radial extension of the overlapping orbitals. The more diffuse the orbitals, the smaller the band gap.

Think about an MO diagram for I2 vs F2. The orbitals on I2 are more diffuse, overlap less effectively, and so the bonding-antibonding gap is smaller than in F2. In the context of solids like diamond and silicon, the bonding orbital is your valence band, the antibonding is your conduction band - Si orbitals are more diffuse, and so the band gap is less.

Another point to think about is band width. A large band width can also be attributed to diffuse orbitals, as larger orbitals will interact with more distant neighbours, which leads to the creation of more combinations of atomic orbitals, and thus a wider spread of MO energies.

Im not sure how well I am explaining this, but a VERY good, readable book for this sort of thing is "the electronic structure and chemistry of solids" - P.A. Cox. Definately check it out
My research: Google Scholar and Researchgate

Sponsored Links