Chemical Forums
1 Hour
1 Day
1 Week
1 Month
Forever
April 28, 2024, 04:21:54 PM
Forum Rules
: Read This Before Posting
Home
Help
Search
Login
Register
Chemical Forums
Chemistry Forums for Students
Undergraduate General Chemistry Forum
Right Number of Significant Digits
« previous
next »
Print
Pages: [
1
]
Go Down
Topic: Right Number of Significant Digits (Read 1756 times)
0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.
salam
New Member
Posts: 8
Mole Snacks: +0/-0
Right Number of Significant Digits
«
on:
September 15, 2016, 04:13:57 PM »
I just wanted to check and see if my answer is to the right number of significant digits or not for the following question:
44.2 mL of 0.5000 M of AgNO3 is added to 270.0 mL of water which contains 5.832 g of K2CrO4. A precipitate of Ag2CrO4 forms. What is the concentration of the unprecipitated Cr2O4 2- (find the moles of the left over reagent and convert to concentration).
I got 0.06031 mol/L. Is that the right number of SD's (4) or should there be less?
Logged
Borek
Mr. pH
Administrator
Deity Member
Posts: 27665
Mole Snacks: +1801/-410
Gender:
I am known to be occasionally wrong.
Re: Right Number of Significant Digits
«
Reply #1 on:
September 15, 2016, 06:22:14 PM »
Too many, for at least two reasons.
First - one of the number given has only 3 SD.
Second - rules for adding and subtracting numbers are a bit different. 0.1000+0.000001234 is not 0.100001234 but 0.1000.
Logged
ChemBuddy
chemical calculators - stoichiometry, pH, concentration, buffer preparation,
titrations.info
docnet
Regular Member
Posts: 46
Mole Snacks: +1/-0
Re: Right Number of Significant Digits
«
Reply #2 on:
September 16, 2016, 02:35:59 AM »
sig figs are important! (my current chemistry teacher apparantly doesn't think so)
Logged
Borek
Mr. pH
Administrator
Deity Member
Posts: 27665
Mole Snacks: +1801/-410
Gender:
I am known to be occasionally wrong.
Re: Right Number of Significant Digits
«
Reply #3 on:
September 16, 2016, 03:00:11 AM »
Quote from: docnet on September 16, 2016, 02:35:59 AM
sig figs are important!
They are not. They are a poor man's way of dealing with the propagation of error. Better than nothing, but they give you a false notion of having things under control. There are much better methods of treating errors in the calculations using uncertain data.
See
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Propagation_of_uncertainty
Logged
ChemBuddy
chemical calculators - stoichiometry, pH, concentration, buffer preparation,
titrations.info
Print
Pages: [
1
]
Go Up
« previous
next »
Sponsored Links
Chemical Forums
Chemistry Forums for Students
Undergraduate General Chemistry Forum
Right Number of Significant Digits