April 27, 2024, 01:36:00 PM
Forum Rules: Read This Before Posting


Topic: Stereochemistry : neighbouring group participation.  (Read 4541 times)

0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.

Offline faust

  • Regular Member
  • ***
  • Posts: 72
  • Mole Snacks: +3/-13
  • I'm a mole!
Stereochemistry : neighbouring group participation.
« on: May 31, 2006, 06:58:47 AM »
Hello,

this is an exercice where we hydrolyze two tosylate. I think there is a neighbouring group participation from the tosyle in one case in order to produce one enantiomere.

And in the second case, we have a SN1. But how could you explain, in that case, why we don't have the neighbouring group participation from the aromatic?

Thank you


Offline Dan

  • Retired Staff
  • Sr. Member
  • *
  • Posts: 4716
  • Mole Snacks: +469/-72
  • Gender: Male
  • Organic Chemist
    • My research
Re: Stereochemistry : neighbouring group participation.
« Reply #1 on: May 31, 2006, 07:24:55 AM »
Does this argument look sensible to you guys?

*updated*
« Last Edit: May 31, 2006, 09:27:08 AM by Dan »
My research: Google Scholar and Researchgate

Offline faust

  • Regular Member
  • ***
  • Posts: 72
  • Mole Snacks: +3/-13
  • I'm a mole!
Re: Stereochemistry : neighbouring group participation.
« Reply #2 on: May 31, 2006, 08:08:30 AM »
Thank you :) that's the answer I think!


Offline Dan

  • Retired Staff
  • Sr. Member
  • *
  • Posts: 4716
  • Mole Snacks: +469/-72
  • Gender: Male
  • Organic Chemist
    • My research
Re: Stereochemistry : neighbouring group participation.
« Reply #3 on: May 31, 2006, 09:18:04 AM »
Hang on! It's not sterics, I thought that was a dodgy argument! If you look at the bridged intermediate from the first one, attach by water can occur on either carbon, so the product is racemic.

Same for the second, but both lead to the same product. I will update the scheme in my previous post!
My research: Google Scholar and Researchgate

Sponsored Links