April 29, 2024, 12:35:22 PM
Forum Rules: Read This Before Posting


Topic: Former Charge vs Electronegativity  (Read 3106 times)

0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.

Offline smghz

  • Regular Member
  • ***
  • Posts: 43
  • Mole Snacks: +0/-1
Former Charge vs Electronegativity
« on: December 14, 2016, 05:48:36 PM »
I was looking at the Lewis structure of CO2 and it being a linear one, despite electronegativity difference, CO2 is non-polar. An explanation was given that O atoms are actually positive-bearing while the C atoms are negative-bearing.
  • How is this possible? Isn't electronegativity the ultimate factor here? That's what we learned in college.
  • What is the use of former charges in chemistry?

Offline Corribus

  • Chemist
  • Sr. Member
  • *
  • Posts: 3484
  • Mole Snacks: +530/-23
  • Gender: Male
  • A lover of spectroscopy and chocolate.
Re: Former Charge vs Electronegativity
« Reply #1 on: December 14, 2016, 09:59:22 PM »
Formal charge is the charge that would be assigned to an atom in a molecule in the limit that all atoms had identical electronegativity (or, if you will, all bonds are perfectly covalent). Contrast this to oxidation state of an atom, which assumes all bonds in a molecule are perfectly ionic - the valence electrons are fully surrounding the atom with higher electronegativity, no matter how small the electronegativity difference is.

In carbon dioxide, to determine the formal charge, the C's and the O's are assumed to have the same electronegativity, and the formal charges on all the atoms are equal to zero, as the formal charge formula is V-N-B/2, where V is the # of valence electrons, N is the number of electrons in nonbonding orbitals around the atom, and B is the number of bonding electrons surrounding the atom, divided by 2. (For instance, each oxygen has 6 valence electrons, two pairs of nonbonding electrons, and two bonds with two electrons each, so F = 6-4-4/2 = 0.)

On the other hand, if we adopt the oxidation state limit (completely ionic bonds), then all the bonding electrons are possessed by the atoms with a higher electronegativity (oxygen in this case). So the oxygens have an oxidation state of -2 each and carbon has an oxidation state of +4.

Realize that both formal charges and oxidation states represent idealized situations and in most cases, neither is a truly realistic picture of the where electrons are in a molecule. In most cases, the true degree of electron sharing is somewhere in the middle - they may spend more time than average around the oxygen atoms than the carbon atoms, given that oxygen atoms are more electronegative, so there is a partial negative charge around oxygens and a partial positive charge around the carbon, and the "units of charge" lay somewhere between the formal charge limit and the oxidation state limit. Whether more toward the latter or former depends on the degree of electronegativity difference between the atoms.

Note that in CO2, no matter what charge distribution model one takes (oxidation state, formal charge, or a more realistic picture that would be determined through sophisticated computer modelling), the dipole moment is zero and the molecule is nonpolar, because all the charge asymmetries cancel each other out.
What men are poets who can speak of Jupiter if he were like a man, but if he is an immense spinning sphere of methane and ammonia must be silent?  - Richard P. Feynman

Offline Vidya

  • Full Member
  • ****
  • Posts: 839
  • Mole Snacks: +46/-62
  • Gender: Female
  • Online Chemistry and Organic Chemistry tutor
    • Online Chemistry Tutor
Re: Former Charge vs Electronegativity
« Reply #2 on: December 15, 2016, 09:36:44 AM »
    .[/li]
    [li]What is the use of former charges in chemistry?[/li]
    [/list]
    Formal charge is actually how an atom using its total valence electrons in making bonds and placing lone pairs around it.So if it is using more than its valence electrons then it will acquire a formal negative charge  and if it is using less than its valence electrons then its acquire a formal positive charge. 

    Sponsored Links