You have two data points: 94 days, and 382 days. You're applying them two two biological organisms, and living things have variability. I expect you're going to be disappointed if you're expecting a conclusive answer. Yes, you're quoting peer-reviewed sources. But ... still ... I'm half expecting a multi page thread of ... yeah ... but ...
Um ... let me start with the loaded question. Hunger strike? Really? That's a quantitative, scientific data point? We're sure the subject wasn't adversely stressed before and during the process?
You have another experiment on 6 people. That's a better source. It gives a range, which is also good. Here's a thought ... how far outside the confidence interval, is the 94 day data point, with respect to the other data?