April 28, 2024, 04:58:47 PM
Forum Rules: Read This Before Posting


Topic: Heat of Combustion  (Read 7146 times)

0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.

Offline mookxi

  • Regular Member
  • ***
  • Posts: 23
  • Mole Snacks: +0/-2
Heat of Combustion
« on: July 01, 2006, 07:43:14 AM »
I'm not really sure how to go about doing this question. Any clues? ;-)

A 300mL volume of LP gas can be burnt to heat 400mL of water from 18.0 degrees celcius to 34.7 degrees celcius. What is the heat of combustion of the LP gas in kJ / L?



thanks ;-)

Offline Borek

  • Mr. pH
  • Administrator
  • Deity Member
  • *
  • Posts: 27665
  • Mole Snacks: +1801/-410
  • Gender: Male
  • I am known to be occasionally wrong.
    • Chembuddy
Re: Heat of Combustion
« Reply #1 on: July 01, 2006, 07:50:59 AM »
Simple heat balance.
ChemBuddy chemical calculators - stoichiometry, pH, concentration, buffer preparation, titrations.info

Offline sdekivit

  • Chemist
  • Full Member
  • *
  • Posts: 403
  • Mole Snacks: +32/-3
  • Gender: Male
  • B.Sc Biomedical Sciences, Utrecht University
Re: Heat of Combustion
« Reply #2 on: July 01, 2006, 09:39:31 AM »

A 300mL volume of LP gas can be burnt to heat 400mL of water from 18.0 degrees celcius to 34.7 degrees celcius. What is the heat of combustion of the LP gas in kJ / L?


300 mL: Q = (c * m * delta T)water

--> now you know heat of combustion of 300 mL LP so you need to convert it to Q / L (assuming no heat is lost to the environment)

Offline anarchron

  • Regular Member
  • ***
  • Posts: 17
  • Mole Snacks: +5/-5
Re: Heat of Combustion
« Reply #3 on: July 01, 2006, 11:24:24 PM »
Check out this answer:

as attachment

Offline mookxi

  • Regular Member
  • ***
  • Posts: 23
  • Mole Snacks: +0/-2
Re: Heat of Combustion
« Reply #4 on: July 02, 2006, 12:33:19 AM »
I first and second answer didn't make sense to me, but the third did! thanks.

Offline Borek

  • Mr. pH
  • Administrator
  • Deity Member
  • *
  • Posts: 27665
  • Mole Snacks: +1801/-410
  • Gender: Male
  • I am known to be occasionally wrong.
    • Chembuddy
Re: Heat of Combustion
« Reply #5 on: July 02, 2006, 03:42:58 AM »
I first and second answer didn't make sense to me, but the third did! thanks.

So you have a problem, because anarchron answer is wrong.
ChemBuddy chemical calculators - stoichiometry, pH, concentration, buffer preparation, titrations.info

Offline sdekivit

  • Chemist
  • Full Member
  • *
  • Posts: 403
  • Mole Snacks: +32/-3
  • Gender: Male
  • B.Sc Biomedical Sciences, Utrecht University
Re: Heat of Combustion
« Reply #6 on: July 02, 2006, 05:10:46 AM »

So you have a problem, because anarchron answer is wrong.

if the mass of water is 400 g instead of the 300 g used in his calculation, the answer will be correct ;)

Offline Borek

  • Mr. pH
  • Administrator
  • Deity Member
  • *
  • Posts: 27665
  • Mole Snacks: +1801/-410
  • Gender: Male
  • I am known to be occasionally wrong.
    • Chembuddy
Re: Heat of Combustion
« Reply #7 on: July 02, 2006, 05:25:44 AM »
But only then :)

Besides, funny thing is that anarchron answer does exactly what we have both suggested, just refraining from giving out the detailed solution.
ChemBuddy chemical calculators - stoichiometry, pH, concentration, buffer preparation, titrations.info

Offline sdekivit

  • Chemist
  • Full Member
  • *
  • Posts: 403
  • Mole Snacks: +32/-3
  • Gender: Male
  • B.Sc Biomedical Sciences, Utrecht University
Re: Heat of Combustion
« Reply #8 on: July 02, 2006, 03:51:06 PM »
But only then :)

Besides, funny thing is that anarchron answer does exactly what we have both suggested, just refraining from giving out the detailed solution.

true  :P ;D

Offline mookxi

  • Regular Member
  • ***
  • Posts: 23
  • Mole Snacks: +0/-2
Re: Heat of Combustion
« Reply #9 on: July 03, 2006, 09:11:30 AM »
But only then :)

Besides, funny thing is that anarchron answer does exactly what we have both suggested, just refraining from giving out the detailed solution.

Oh really? I'm sorry! I suppose the fact that we're both doing the same course study and method helps. I didn't quite understand what "Q", "c*" means.

And oh, I didn't even notice that Anachron's answer was wrong, Thanks for picking it up. I used 400g anyway ;-)

Sponsored Links