June 15, 2024, 05:32:57 PM
Forum Rules: Read This Before Posting


Topic: to be or not to be (tetrahedral)  (Read 1326 times)

0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.

Offline luketapis

  • Regular Member
  • ***
  • Posts: 49
  • Mole Snacks: +0/-0
to be or not to be (tetrahedral)
« on: November 06, 2012, 08:27:27 PM »
Hi I have a question:

Which of the following complexes is the more likely to be tetrahedral; [Ni(CN)4]2- or [NiCl4]2-

They are both d8 Cl- is small ligand so it gives high spin. So is that specie going to be tetrahedral?
BTW I thought that Coordination No.= 4 and d8 gives squer planar.

Offline kaliaden

  • Regular Member
  • ***
  • Posts: 10
  • Mole Snacks: +2/-0
  • Gender: Male
Re: to be or not to be (tetrahedral)
« Reply #1 on: November 07, 2012, 10:24:28 AM »
Ni2+ can form both square planar and tetrahedral complexes with coordination 4.
With strong ligands like CN, it forms square planar complexes. However, with some weak ligands like Cl-, Br-, I- it forms tetrahedral complexes since the splitting energy is small.

But other elements with d8 configuration like Pd2+ and Pt2+ form only square planar complexes.

Sponsored Links